If you’re giving a commencement speech in 2026, maybe don’t mention AI
Commencement speakers mentioning AI at recent graduation ceremonies have been met with boos and strong disapproval from students. This negative reaction highlights a growing pessimism among young people regarding the future impact of AI on their job prospects and overall societal well-being.
Commencement speeches featuring artificial intelligence have been met with widespread disapproval and booing from graduating students this year. Speakers at the University of Central Florida and the University of Arizona experienced this firsthand when their mentions of AI sparked negative reactions from the audience. This trend suggests a palpable unease among graduates about the future.
At the University of Central Florida, executive Gloria Caulfield was booed after declaring AI the "next industrial revolution." Similarly, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt faced boos at the University of Arizona when he told students they would "help shape artificial intelligence." In Schmidt's case, student criticism began even before his speech, fueled by unrelated allegations.
The student backlash isn't universal, as Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang’s AI-focused speech at Carnegie Mellon was well-received. However, the general pessimism reflects broader concerns. A recent Gallup poll showed a significant drop in optimism among young Americans about finding local jobs.
This widespread apprehension isn't solely due to AI, but many students view it as "the cruel new face of hyper-scaling capitalism," according to critic Brian Merchant. The sentiment was echoed by a student who imagined booing the "next industrial revolution" if unemployed and aspiring to more than just entering prompts into an LLM. Even without explicit AI mentions, "resilience" was a recurring theme in speeches, acknowledging fears about job displacement and a fractured future.
Related articles
When the Trump administration cracks down on Anthropic, who benefits?
The Trump administration issued an export control order against Anthropic, forcing the AI company to pull its newest models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, offline. This move has sparked debate over AI policy and digital sovereignty, with some suggesting political motivations and others questioning Anthropic’s own messaging around AI safety.
Signal’s Meredith Whittaker wants you to remember that AI chatbots ‘are not your friends’
Signal President Meredith Whittaker cautions against the over-reliance on AI chatbots, emphasizing they are not sentient and can pose significant privacy risks. She highlights concerns about pervasive data access when integrating AI into personal and sensitive applications.
Ethics & SocietyCritical Copilot vulnerability allowed hackers to seal 2FA code from users
Microsoft patched a critical vulnerability in its M365 Copilot AI platform that allowed attackers to extract sensitive data, including 2FA codes, from users. This vulnerability, dubbed "SearchLeak," exploited Copilot's inability to distinguish between user instructions and malicious commands embedded in third-party content.
