PRC-linked influence operations are targeting AI debates in the US
OpenAI identified and banned two China-linked influence operations that used its models to manipulate US AI policy debates. These operations, dubbed "Data Center Bandwagon" and "Tech and Tariffs," aimed to exploit public concerns and insert narratives into American discourse. The attempts highlight a new vector for foreign interference in critical technological discussions.
Our mission at OpenAI is to ensure artificial general intelligence benefits all humanity. We achieve this by deploying innovations to build democratic AI, governed by common-sense rules, helping solve complex problems while protecting against harm. This also involves identifying and disrupting attempts by authoritarian regimes to use AI systems for coercion, surveillance, or covert interference in democratic societies.
We banned two clusters of ChatGPT accounts, likely originating from China, for using our models in covert influence operations. These operations promoted narratives to manipulate legitimate debates about American AI and broader tech policies. This interference underscores the evolving landscape of digital threats.
The first cluster, termed the "Data Center Bandwagon" campaign, generated social media comments and images. These falsely claimed that AI data center expansions were raising electricity prices for families. The second cluster, the "Tech and Tariffs" campaign, criticized US tariffs as attempts to dominate technological competition and specifically avoided mentioning China's leader, Xi Jinping, in their output.
This targeting of OpenAI and US data center infrastructure is significant. While these operations didn't appear to shift public opinion, they show PRC-origin influence operators testing narratives against critical AI infrastructure. This infrastructure is a foundation of US technological leadership, economic growth, and the broader democratic AI ecosystem.
The operators tried to exploit existing public concerns about energy prices and the local impacts of data center development. However, we found no evidence of meaningful breakout beyond their own activities. Foreign influence operations frequently latch onto local issues and deeply held beliefs to build credibility, amplify divisions, or exacerbate public distrust.
By publishing these findings, we aim to help partners—industry, governments, and civil society—better identify and disrupt foreign threat actors. This proactive approach is crucial to counter attempts to manipulate public debates, weaken democratic institutions, and advance totalitarianism using AI for surveillance, censorship, and control.
Related articles
When the Trump administration cracks down on Anthropic, who benefits?
The Trump administration issued an export control order against Anthropic, forcing the AI company to pull its newest models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, offline. This move has sparked debate over AI policy and digital sovereignty, with some suggesting political motivations and others questioning Anthropic’s own messaging around AI safety.
Signal’s Meredith Whittaker wants you to remember that AI chatbots ‘are not your friends’
Signal President Meredith Whittaker cautions against the over-reliance on AI chatbots, emphasizing they are not sentient and can pose significant privacy risks. She highlights concerns about pervasive data access when integrating AI into personal and sensitive applications.
Ethics & SocietyCritical Copilot vulnerability allowed hackers to seal 2FA code from users
Microsoft patched a critical vulnerability in its M365 Copilot AI platform that allowed attackers to extract sensitive data, including 2FA codes, from users. This vulnerability, dubbed "SearchLeak," exploited Copilot's inability to distinguish between user instructions and malicious commands embedded in third-party content.
