Trump loses more control over AI regulation as Illinois passes landmark law

Illinois has passed a landmark AI safety law, requiring major AI firms to submit safety plans and report incidents. This move comes as federal regulation remains stalled, positioning Illinois as a leader in AI governance despite concerns about potential impacts on innovation and regulatory fragmentation.
Illinois has enacted the nation's strongest artificial intelligence (AI) safety law, SB 315, which mandates that major AI firms submit public safety plans and conduct third-party safety testing. They must also report critical safety incidents within 72 hours, or 24 hours if there's an imminent risk of serious physical harm or death. This legislation provides whistleblower protections for employees reporting emerging safety concerns.
Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker has voiced his intent to sign the bill, emphasizing the state's commitment to holding "Big Tech accountable." Both OpenAI and Anthropic, key players in the AI industry, have expressed support for SB 315. Their backing may stem from a desire to establish a consistent regulatory baseline across states, which could inadvertently benefit larger firms while posing challenges for smaller ones.
The law aims to increase transparency, particularly regarding rapid AI developments, and will likely rely on major accounting and auditing firms to verify safety practices. This initiative by Illinois highlights a growing trend of states stepping in due to a lack of federal action on AI regulation, despite concerns from critics about the preparedness of governments and independent auditors to evaluate advanced AI models.
While some industry groups, like Chamber of Progress, oppose the law, citing concerns about exposing sensitive systems to "untested auditors," proponents argue it's essential for establishing "minimal guardrails." Democratic Rep. Daniel Didech, a sponsor of the bill, acknowledged that federal regulation would be ideal but stated that states have been compelled to act given the rapid pace of technological development and the absence of federal protections.
Starting January 1, 2027, AI firms will be subject to the law's provisions, with potential civil penalties for violations. This legislative effort by Illinois is viewed by policymakers and advocacy groups as a crucial step towards ensuring that AI is developed and used responsibly, balancing its transformative potential with the imperative to prevent catastrophic risks.
Related articles
When the Trump administration cracks down on Anthropic, who benefits?
The Trump administration issued an export control order against Anthropic, forcing the AI company to pull its newest models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, offline. This move has sparked debate over AI policy and digital sovereignty, with some suggesting political motivations and others questioning Anthropic’s own messaging around AI safety.
Signal’s Meredith Whittaker wants you to remember that AI chatbots ‘are not your friends’
Signal President Meredith Whittaker cautions against the over-reliance on AI chatbots, emphasizing they are not sentient and can pose significant privacy risks. She highlights concerns about pervasive data access when integrating AI into personal and sensitive applications.
Ethics & SocietyCritical Copilot vulnerability allowed hackers to seal 2FA code from users
Microsoft patched a critical vulnerability in its M365 Copilot AI platform that allowed attackers to extract sensitive data, including 2FA codes, from users. This vulnerability, dubbed "SearchLeak," exploited Copilot's inability to distinguish between user instructions and malicious commands embedded in third-party content.
