Why Google’s AI can’t spell Google (or anything else)
Google's AI Overview is making basic spelling errors, like misspelling "journalism" and struggling to count letters in words. These issues stem from how large language models (LLMs) process text, breaking it into numerical tokens rather than "reading" words and letters like humans do.
Google's AI Overview, a new feature for its search engine, is consistently making basic spelling and grammatical errors. Examples include misspelling "journalism" and incorrectly counting the number of letters in words like "Google" and "poop." These glaring mistakes have drawn significant attention and concern.
This isn't the first time Google's AI search features have stumbled. Previous iterations cited satirical articles and provided unhelpful or even dangerous advice. The current errors highlight ongoing challenges as Google integrates generative AI more deeply into its core products.
Google acknowledges that counting within words has been a known challenge for large language models (LLMs), which power these AI features. These models are not built to understand spelling in the human sense. Instead, they break down text into "tokens"—numerical representations of words, syllables, or letters—rather than processing them as coherent linguistic units.
Researchers explain that LLMs use a transformer architecture where input prompts are translated into an encoding. This means the AI recognizes "the" as a single encoded unit but doesn't understand it as a combination of the letters "T," "H," and "E." This token-based approach, while powerful for many AI tasks, inherently limits their ability to handle spelling accurately.
While spelling accuracy isn't the primary utility of LLMs, these persistent errors serve as a critical reminder. They demonstrate that even advanced AI systems are not infallible and should not be blindly trusted. Users must continue to verify information and outputs generated by AI.
Related articles
The AI world is getting ‘loopy’
AI models are taking a significant leap forward with the adoption of "agentic loops," where AI agents continuously prompt each other to improve code and solve complex problems. This approach, though potentially resource-intensive, promises to unlock new levels of autonomous problem-solving and efficiency in AI applications.
Codex-maxxing for long-running work
Codex is increasingly being used by organizations to support long-running projects that go beyond a single prompt. This whitepaper by Jason Liu offers practical strategies for leveraging Codex as a persistent workspace, managing complex workflows and sustaining progress.
Nobel laureate John Jumper is leaving DeepMind for rival Anthropic
Nobel laureate John Jumper is departing Google DeepMind to join its competitor, Anthropic, after dedicating nearly nine years to DeepMind, where he led the AlphaFold team. Jumper, who shared a Nobel Prize for his work on AlphaFold, expressed gratitude for his time at DeepMind while looking forward to new endeavors.
